Section 134 Finance Act

public notice enactment  finance act   dream daily

Section 134 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Section 134: Forfeiture of Certain Bonuses and Profits

Section 134 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, often referred to as the “clawback” provision, empowers the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to recover certain executive compensation in the event of a material restatement of a company’s financial statements resulting from misconduct.

The core purpose of Section 134 is to hold corporate executives accountable for their actions and deter financial wrongdoing. It aims to prevent individuals who engaged in, or contributed to, financial misstatements from profiting from their misconduct. The section allows the SEC to seek reimbursement from the CEO and CFO, regardless of their personal involvement in the specific act that caused the restatement.

Specifically, if a company is required to restate its financial statements due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under securities laws, the CEO and CFO may be compelled to forfeit certain compensation. This forfeiture covers:

  • Bonuses: Any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation received during the 12-month period following the initial filing of the financial statement that ultimately required restatement.
  • Profits from Stock Sales: Any profits realized from the sale of company stock during that same 12-month period.

It is crucial to understand that Section 134 applies even if the CEO and CFO were not directly responsible for the restatement-triggering misconduct. The statute imposes this obligation on them by virtue of their positions of leadership and ultimate responsibility for the accuracy of the company’s financial reporting. This reinforces the idea that they are accountable for the overall integrity of the company’s financial statements, regardless of individual culpability.

The significance of Section 134 lies in its proactive approach to preventing corporate fraud and ensuring financial transparency. By holding top executives financially responsible for financial misstatements, it creates a powerful incentive for them to promote ethical behavior and implement robust internal controls.

While Section 134 provides a legal framework for the SEC to recover compensation, enforcing it can be complex. Determining the specific amounts to be forfeited and establishing the connection between the restatement and executive compensation often requires detailed investigation and legal analysis. The SEC must demonstrate a clear causal link between the misconduct leading to the restatement and the compensation received by the CEO and CFO during the relevant period.

Moreover, litigation regarding the forfeiture of executive compensation under Section 134 can be lengthy and expensive. Companies and executives often contest the SEC’s findings, leading to protracted legal battles.

Despite these challenges, Section 134 remains a valuable tool for the SEC in its efforts to combat corporate fraud and protect investors. It serves as a strong deterrent, encouraging corporate executives to prioritize accurate financial reporting and to take a proactive approach to preventing financial wrongdoing within their organizations. The threat of forfeiture incentivizes vigilance and promotes a culture of compliance, contributing to the overall integrity of the financial markets.

section     finance act     excise 768×1024 section finance act excise from www.scribd.com
act    finance act  final  corporate tax 474×632 act finance act final corporate tax from www.scribd.com

finance act 768×994 finance act from studylib.net
income tax act chapter  section  income iras 495×640 income tax act chapter section income iras from www.yumpu.com

section   finance act   invoked  absence  deliberate 1600×840 section finance act invoked absence deliberate from www.taxscan.in
section   internal control financial statement 768×1024 section internal control financial statement from www.scribd.com

finance act  edition iii  taxes employment 768×1024 finance act edition iii taxes employment from www.scribd.com
frequently asked questions  form       justice 768×1024 frequently asked questions form justice from www.scribd.com

directors report  section   companies act 590×299 directors report section companies act from taxguru.in
madras high court emphasises applicability  section   finance act 1600×840 madras high court emphasises applicability section finance act from www.taxscan.in

section  financial statement boards report companies act 1280×720 section financial statement boards report companies act from www.aubsp.com
checking   section  rfccincinnati 3024×4032 checking section rfccincinnati from www.reddit.com

workshop  section   motor vehicle act   supreme court 768×1024 workshop section motor vehicle act supreme court from www.scribd.com
state finance act 768×1024 state finance act from www.scribd.com

companies act  section  bare act 595×842 companies act section bare act from www.academia.edu
art   economias 768×594 art economias from es.scribd.com

finance act  ccs 390×666 finance act ccs from ccs-co.com
section  ratlantaunited 4032×3024 section ratlantaunited from www.reddit.com

finance act   taxes double taxation 768×1024 finance act taxes double taxation from www.scribd.com
section   companies act 1024×550 section companies act from www.cabkgoyal.com

section  archives ipleaders 534×360 section archives ipleaders from blog.ipleaders.in
comments  finance act   saiduddin 1696×1224 comments finance act saiduddin from saiduddin.com.pk

public notice enactment  finance act   dream daily 905×1280 public notice enactment finance act dream daily from www.thedreamdaily.com
finance act  notified  president assent ll  finance 1200×630 finance act notified president assent ll finance from www.taxcorner.co.in

article   rebellions crimes 768×1024 article rebellions crimes from www.scribd.com
penalty  violation  provisions  section    companies act 352×101 penalty violation provisions section companies act from www.linkedin.com

section  ipc abetment   assault   assault  committed 1200×675 section ipc abetment assault assault committed from capitalvakalat.com
extended time limit  proviso  section   finance act 600×345 extended time limit proviso section finance act from www.taxscan.in