Shelter Finance In The Age Of Neoliberalism

ceeol article detail

Shelter Finance in the Age of Neoliberalism

Neoliberalism, with its emphasis on deregulation, privatization, and market-based solutions, has profoundly reshaped shelter finance globally. Historically, governments played a significant role in providing affordable housing through direct construction, subsidies, and social housing programs. However, under neoliberal influence, this role has diminished, shifting responsibility to the private sector and individual homeowners.

This shift has manifested in several key trends. Firstly, the financialization of housing has accelerated. Housing is increasingly treated as a commodity for investment, rather than a social good. Mortgage-backed securities, Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), and other financial instruments have attracted significant capital into the housing market, driving up prices and making homeownership less accessible, particularly for low- and middle-income families.

Secondly, deregulation of financial markets has led to increased risk-taking by lenders. Subprime mortgages and other predatory lending practices, often fueled by the desire for quick profits, contributed to the 2008 financial crisis, which had devastating consequences for housing markets worldwide. Many individuals lost their homes, and access to credit tightened, further exacerbating housing affordability issues.

Thirdly, the privatization of public housing has reduced the supply of affordable rental units. As governments sell off public housing stock to private developers, the focus often shifts from providing low-cost housing to maximizing profits. This can result in increased rents, displacement of low-income residents, and a shrinking pool of affordable housing options.

Furthermore, neoliberal policies often prioritize individual homeownership over other forms of housing, such as cooperative housing or rental housing. Tax incentives and subsidies are typically geared towards homeowners, further incentivizing individual ownership and contributing to the commodification of housing. This bias can disadvantage those who cannot afford to own a home and limit the diversity of housing options available.

The consequences of neoliberal shelter finance are significant. Increased housing costs contribute to rising inequality, housing insecurity, and homelessness. Vulnerable populations, including low-income families, minorities, and the elderly, are disproportionately affected. Addressing these challenges requires a re-evaluation of neoliberal policies and a renewed commitment to public investment in affordable housing, regulation of financial markets, and support for diverse housing options that meet the needs of all members of society.

neoliberalism privatization finance bringing systems  focus 594×314 neoliberalism privatization finance bringing systems focus from acrecampaigns.org
ceeol article detail 400×562 ceeol article detail from www.ceeol.com

housing precarity parrhesiastesnet 638×382 housing precarity parrhesiastesnet from parrhesiastes.net
system social wealth funds parrhesiastesnet 1920×1200 system social wealth funds parrhesiastesnet from parrhesiastes.net

neoliberalism oversold finance development june 350×232 neoliberalism oversold finance development june from www.imf.org
neoliberalism definition  examples 3000×2149 neoliberalism definition examples from www.thoughtco.com

neoliberal settlement  violent state project west bank settlement 2692×1229 neoliberal settlement violent state project west bank settlement from acme-journal.org